Washington State University
December 8, 2025
Goodchild, Nargis, and d’Espaignet (2018)
Olds and Milner (1954) Brain stimulation reward
Until a more adequate view comes along it seems useful to consider the dopamine synapse as, among other things, a pleasure center in the brain.
Roy Wise 1980 The dopamine synapse and the notion of ‘pleasure centers’ in the brain
A wide variety of biologically important stimuli [e.g., food, sex] can serve as rewards and establish adaptive behavior patterns in higher animals. Such stimuli act through brain mechanisms that evolved long before the human invention of the hypodermic syringe, the human harnessing of fire, or the human development of methods for refining and concentrating psychoactive substances that occur in nature.
There is a mismatch between our evolved reward neurobiology and evolutionarily novel drugs
Dopamine was initially thought to function as the internal representation of a hedonic state (pleasure), but this has been shown not to be the case, as animals can still exhibit positive hedonic responses in the absence of dopamine….Mice in which dopamine is blocked or absent exhibit a clear preference (liking) for sweet fluids…over unsweetened alternatives….
Hyman, Malenka, and Nestler (2006)
Some are reward-related, many are not
Establishing functionally segregated dopaminergic circuits (Terauchi, Johnson-Venkatesh, and Umemori 2025)
The midbrain dopamine (mDA) system is composed of molecularly and functionally distinct neuron subtypes that mediate specific behaviours
Garritsen et al. (2023)
DA signaling has been largely thought to involve a slow and diffuse mode of transmission. However, our data indicate that DA release can be short-lived (~100 ms) and highly localized (<5 μm), allowing the possibility for release events to signal at precise, subcellular scales.
Yee et al. (2025)

Establishing functionally segregated dopaminergic circuits (Terauchi, Johnson-Venkatesh, and Umemori 2025)
Some are dopaminergic, many are not
Sitte (2024)

Hyman, Malenka, and Nestler (2006)

Koob and Volkow (2009)

Koob and Volkow (2009)

Koob and Volkow (2016)

Bogdan et al. (2022)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t6xKBirUVNg
What drugs are doing is basically hijacking the main motivational drive circuit that we have in our brains…
A critique, not of the neurobiology of drug use, but of its evolutionary cover story, based on two ancient evolutionary arms races:
Autotrophs (e.g., plants): Obtain energy from inorganic sources, e.g., geothermal vents or sunlight
Heterotrophs (e.g., animals): Obtain energy by eating autotrophs (directly or indirectly)
Arms race!
Intensifying zoonotic pathogen pressure in Pleistocene Homo selected for increased pharmacological plant use
Domı́nguez-Rodrigo et al. (2021)
Kim et al. (2020)
Ebola, HIV, and monkeypox, SARS-CoV-1, and possibly SARS-CoV-2 (Kurpiers et al., 2016; Peros et al., 2021).
Systematic review: 133 reports of disease involving 60 pathogens in 58 bushmeat species, mostly mammals (95%), with some reptiles (4%) and birds (1%).
The most common zoonotic pathogens were helminths (37%) and bacteria (33%), followed by viruses and protozoa (15% each) (Peros et al., 2021).


There are reports of self-medication in 71 species from 7 mammalian orders, with the most reports in Primates (46 species), Carnivores (10 species), and Rodents (5 species) (Neco et al. 2019).

Brazilian Tupinamba curing by blowing tobacco smoke. Andre Thevet, La Cosmographie Universelle, 1575
Dufloo et al. (2025)
Han, Kramer, and Drake (2016b)
Brierley, Pedersen, and Woolhouse (2019)
Leaves: correct classifications.
Brierley, Pedersen, and Woolhouse (2019)
Guth et al. (2019)